Contact Us

Navbar 1

One area that has seen a significant transformation in recent years is recruitment. Traditional methods of hiring often involve time-consuming processes, extensive manual labor, and high costs. However, the emergence of job autosourcing is changing the game, revolutionizing the way companies find and attract top talen

Introduction

Description

SUMMARY- Case 1: Co-Founder Leaves with 40% Equity What Went Wrong: A Pune-based startup never signed a founders’ agreement. One co-founder walked away within a year- taking 40% of equity with him. Legal Outcome: No vesting clause. No buyback rights. No non-compete. Investors pulled out. The company folded. Takeaway: Without a founders’ agreement, you can’t: Enforce equity vesting Prevent a founder from starting a competing company Get back unearned equity Case 2: Freelancer Owns Your MVP What Went Wrong: A Delhi startup hired a freelancer to build their MVP. No contract. No IP clause. Once the code was ready, the freelancer demanded more money, or he’d keep the code. Legal Outcome: Under Indian Copyright Act, the creator owns the IP unless a written assignment says otherwise. The startup had no claim. They had to pay again to access their own product. Takeaway: Unless it’s in writing, you don’t own the work, even if you paid for it. Case 3: Vendor Files FIR, Not Invoice What Went Wrong: a once-famous homestay startup, owed ₹1.6 crore to an ad agency. No contract existed. When payment was delayed, the vendor filed a police complaint. Legal Outcome: The founder was arrested. A civil issue turned into a criminal one. The startup shut down. The founder spent nearly a month in jail. Takeaway: Without a written contract, even business (civil) disputes can be twisted into criminal complaints and which may lead to imprisonment for Founders. Case 4: Intern Walks Off With Source Code What Went Wrong: A tech intern left a startup and reused its code at a competitor. No NDA, no work-for-hire clause. Legal Outcome: The startup had no written evidence that the IP was theirs. Courts had little to work with. Takeaway: Interns and employees must sign NDAs and IP assignments. Otherwise, your secrets walk out the door. Legal Principles at Play Oral contracts are legal but hard to prove Freelancers own their work unless IP is assigned in writing Without a founders’ agreement, equity disputes go to NCLT or courts Criminal complaints are easier when no terms are documented Preventive Checklist for Founders Founders’ Agreement – Roles, equity, vesting, exit terms IP Assignment Clauses – In all freelancer/consultant contracts Vendor Contracts – With clear deliverables, payment terms & dispute resolution Employment/Internship Letters – With NDAs, scope, termination rights and IP ownership Document Everything – Mails, memos, even Slack messages to track understanding Importance of a Contract A contract is a legally binding agreement between parties who voluntarily agree to undertake specific obligations and actions enforceable by law. The essentials of a valid contract include an offer, acceptance, contractual capacity, mutual consent from all parties involved, along with a lawful object and consideration that is backed by law. For instance, a technology startup entering into a service agreement with a corporate client for software deployment must define deliverables, payment terms, service levels, and confidentiality obligations in a contract. Such a contract ensures that both parties are aligned on expectations and responsibilities, enabling smooth execution. Should either party default on its obligations, contractual liability may arise, subjecting the defaulting party to legal consequences. Since the contract is mutually agreed upon, the non-breaching party is entitled to seek damages or specific relief in the event of non-performance. Startups often begin with enthusiasm and trust, relying on handshakes or verbal understandings rather than formal contracts. In India, oral agreements are legally valid under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and even courts have upheld that unwritten contracts can be binding. However, the absence of written documentation creates serious evidentiary and legal risks. It becomes difficult to prove the exact terms of a deal, leading to protracted disputes or inability to enforce rights. This has been evident in several real-world cases involving startup founders, intellectual property, and vendor or service relationships. In the hustle of launching a startup, many founders inadvertently sideline critical legal documentation, assuming it can be addressed later. However, this oversight can lead to internal conflicts, IP disputes, or fundraising delays down the line. Below, we examine key examples and legal principles from Indian High Courts, the Supreme Court, and notable tribunals, focusing on how the lack of a written contract led to conflict or losses. Founder Disputes Without a Founder’s Agreement Starting a venture without a clear founder’s agreement can be a recipe for conflict. Such an agreement defines each founder’s equity, roles, and exit terms. In its absence, misunderstandings over contributions or commitments often escalate into disputes. In fact, over 65% of founder breakups happen with no founders’ agreement in place, and this oversight can make or break a startup when things go sour. Case in Point: A notable example involved a young startup in Pune where one co-founder suddenly quit without any contractual obligations tying him to the company. He walked away, retaining 40% of the equity, since there was no prior agreement on vesting or buy-back of his shares. The remaining team and investors were left in the lurch, investors pulled out, and ultimately the startup folded. The key fact here is that nothing in writing prevented the departing founder from keeping his stake or obligated him to stay during critical early years. The outcome was a legal and financial debacle: the company had no means to force an equity transfer or impose a non-compete, and the mere prospect of a long court battle made investors lose confidence. This case underscores the legal principle that while corporate law might provide some default rules, a tailored founder’s contract is crucial for defining what happens if a co-founder leaves. Without it, any dispute must rely on general company law or protracted negotiations, often leading to costly litigation or collapse of the venture. Key takeaways: In founder disputes, the lack of a written agreement means there is no predetermined mechanism to handle equity splits, roles, or exits. The legal outcome is often that one party retains rights (e.g. share ownership or IP) that they would otherwise have relinquished under a contract, and the other founders have limited recourse. Many such disputes end up as petitions of oppression or mismanagement before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) or in settlement negotiations, which could be avoided by having a comprehensive founders’ agreement in the first place. Intellectual Property Rights Disputes Without Contracts Intellectual property (IP) created in a startup, such as software code, designs, or inventions can become contentious if ownership is not clearly documented. A written contract (employment agreement, consultancy contract, or IP assignment) typically ensures that any IP developed by founders, employees, or contractors is assigned to the company. Without such a contract, Indian law defaults to the creator owning the IP. In fact, for independent contractors or freelancers, “the default rule in India is that the creator retains ownership unless there is a written assignment transferring the rights.” This means that if a startup hires a developer or designer without an IP assignment clause, the company might not legally own the work product, even if it paid for it. Case in Point: In one Delhi startup, a solo founder learned this lesson the hard way. He hired a freelance developer to build the product’s MVP (minimum viable product) but had no written agreement or IP transfer clause in place. When the project was completed, the freelancer demanded additional payment or else he refused to hand over the source code. Legally, the developer was in a strong position because copyright in the code vested in him as the author by default. The startup had little choice but to negotiate and pay, since there was no contract to enforce a transfer of rights. The key facts (no contract, developer as an independent contractor) led to the outcome that the company nearly lost its core software. This illustrates the principle that unwritten understandings (“I paid for it so I own it”) do not override IP law, only a written assignment or employment contract would have given the company clear ownership. Legal Principle: Under Indian Copyright Act, an employer is the first owner of copyright only when work is created by an employee in the course of employment (and even then, it not prudent to have it in writing). For non-employees like freelancers or vendors, the creator is the first owner unless an agreement says otherwise. Courts have thus seen startups entangled in disputes where a former tech collaborator or departing co-founder claims rights over source code, patents, or brand assets because no contract assigned those to the company. The legal resolution often requires the company to either litigate for an implied license or ownership (an uphill battle) or settle by buying out the IP. Both routes can be expensive and uncertain. Indian startups can face analogous claims if, say, a friend who helped develop a prototype later asserts IP rights in the product. Key Takeaway: Failing to have written IP agreements can delay investment (investors typically insist on proof that the company owns its IP) and can even halt a product launch if ownership is disputed. Conversely, startups that do get these agreements in place have successfully averted such issues. The lesson is clear: to avoid legal complications, founders must “get it in writing” that all IP created for the startup is assigned to the company. This prevents scenarios where a critical piece of code or a patent ends up stuck with an ex-contributor, leading to costly litigation or project derailment. Vendor and Client Disputes Due to No Formal Contract Startups frequently engage with clients, suppliers, or service vendors on the basis of trust or rushed, informal arrangements. Not having a written vendor/client contract or service agreement can lead to serious misunderstandings about payment terms, deliverables, or remedies for breach. Two prominent real-world disputes in India’s startup ecosystem illustrate how the absence of a contract turned business deals into legal battles: Case in Point: Stayzilla, once a high-profile homestay startup, faced a notorious fallout with its advertising vendor that highlights the perils of an unwritten contract. Stayzilla had accrued about ₹1.6 crore in dues to a Chennai-based ad agency (Jigsaw Advertising) for services rendered. However, there was no written contract outlining the terms of this service. When payments were not made on time, the vendor alleged fraud and filed a police complaint. What could have been a civil claim for breach of contract turned into criminal charges of cheating, breach of trust, and intimidation. Stayzilla’s founder, Yogendra Vasupal, was arrested and jailed for almost a month during the investigation. His counsel argued in court that the matter was purely civil, essentially an unpaid invoice with no formal contract, while the prosecution painted it as criminal deception. The Madras High Court, observing that this was a business transaction gone sour, suggested mediation between the parties. Vasupal eventually secured bail on the condition of depositing ₹40 lakh, but only after spending 28 days in custody. The outcome here was disastrous reputationally and financially: the startup had already halted operations, and the founder underwent tremendous personal strain. The legal principle underlined by this case is that lacking a contract can blur the lines between a civil dispute and a potential criminal matter, without clear terms, a non-payment dispute opened the door to allegations of “dishonest intention” from inception. A detailed written agreement (with clauses on payment schedule, penalties for delay, and a dispute resolution mechanism) could have kept this in civil courts or arbitration. Instead, the vacuum of documentation led to a high-profile FIR and a cautionary tale that shook the startup community. It prompted calls for entrepreneurs to “write everything down” and include mediation/arbitration clauses to handle such conflicts in the future. Key Takeaway: In both cases, the startups and vendors found themselves mired in uncertainty because there was no clear contract to fall back on. Indian courts do consider emails and other correspondence to infer a contract (and yes, an exchange of emails can form a binding agreement), but as seen above, the absence of a single document with all terms invites disputes about what was agreed. Moreover, without a written dispute resolution clause, parties end up going to police or regular courts, which is costlier and slower. Employment and Service Issues Stemming from No Written Agreement It is not just external contracts, even internal arrangements like hiring employees, interns, or service providers can backfire legally if not documented. A written employment contract or internship letter sets expectations on compensation, duration, confidentiality, etc. Without it, disputes can escalate in unexpected ways. Case in Point: In many startups, early hires or co-founders join without formal letters, often in the rush of a bootstrap phase. This can lead to issues where an employee later claims ownership of work or leaves to join a competitor with sensitive knowhow. Indian law does not imply non-disclosure or non-compete obligations on employees without a contract (and even with a contract, post-termination non-competes are largely unenforceable in India, though NDAs are enforceable). A known scenario is when a key technical employee left a startup and there was no NDA or work-for-hire agreement the employee was free to use the knowledge or even source code developed at the startup, because nothing legally prevented it. One real example involved an early employee at a tech startup who departed and reused chunks of the startup’s code in a new venture; the startup discovered it had no explicit clause to assert that the code was confidential or company-owned, limiting its legal remedies. Similarly, absent a clear written commission agreement, sales agents or consultants have been known to dispute their entitlements e.g. a consultant might claim he was promised equity or a bonus verbally, which the company later denies. Such claims can end up in court under the Contract Act, but without written proof, courts have to rely on witness testimony and surrounding circumstances, which is time-consuming and uncertain. Legal principles: As a baseline, oral agreements in employment or service relationships are hard to prove. The party asserting a term (e.g. “I was promised X salary or Y shares”) has the burden to prove it, which is difficult without a document or email. This is why companies use offer letters, consultancy contracts, NDAs, etc. Even if not legally mandated, these documents become crucial evidence of what everyone agreed. Key Takeaway: From a dispute-resolution standpoint, having things in writing often keeps matters out of courts altogether: many times the mere existence of a signed contract dissuades frivolous claims. In cases where there was no written agreement, startups have often had to settle disputes privately at a loss, or endure long legal battles that drain resources. The pattern across all these scenarios is clear: the absence of a written contract skews the legal playing field. It either leaves the party without leverage (as in the IP/code example, where the founder had to pay up) or pushes the dispute into a grey area of law where outcomes are unpredictable (as with oral promises to vendors or employees). Conclusion and Preventive Measures The above examples from Indian startups, co-founders splitting without agreements, code ownership tussles, vendors dragging founders to jail, and even interns causing legal trouble all underscore a simple but vital point: lack of documentation leads to legal and financial turmoil. The key legal principles involved include enforceability of oral contracts (yes, they are enforceable, but provably enforcing them is difficult) and the default rules of law that fill the gap (e.g. creator owns IP absent agreement). In almost every instance, the aggrieved party’s position would have been stronger with a well-drafted written contract: A founders’ agreement could pre-emptively settle equity and exit issues, avoiding NCLT litigation or investor loss. An IP assignment agreement ensures the startup owns its innovations, so no developer or departing founder can hold the product hostage Written service contracts with clients/vendors can delineate payment terms and quality expectations, so that non-payment or “deficiency” claims can be resolved through arbitration or court as a clear breach of contract, rather than devolving into criminal complaints or public feuds Employment letters and NDAs make clear what each party is entitled to and what remains proprietary to the company, thereby deterring lawsuits and protecting the startup’s assets. Notably, Indian courts and industry experts now actively advocate for startups to embrace legal documentation. After the Stayzilla incident, startup associations began training founders to “have every commitment written down,” and to include clauses for mediation/arbitration in agreements as a first step in dispute resolution. This aligns with the approach of the Commercial Courts Act which encourages pre-litigation mediation something that can be built into contracts for efficiency. The Madras High Court’s suggestion of mediation in Stayzilla’s case indicates judicial preference to handle such disputes outside of criminal proceedings when a proper agreement exists. In summary, the outcomes of the cases above ranged from companies shutting down, founders losing control, payments being forfeited, to personal legal peril are all largely because a written contract was missing at the crucial time. The preventive measure is straightforward: draft clear, written contracts for every key relationship in a startup. As one legal commentator put it, contracts are “business shields, not paperwork”, protecting your venture’s ideas, partnerships, and transactions from future conflict. Indian startup jurisprudence, as it is evolving, essentially reinforces age-old wisdom: get it in writing, or be prepared to face the consequences. Each of the real-world examples above serves as a stark reminder that the cost of documentation is far cheaper than the cost of a legal dispute without it.

Startups Break Without This One Thing: Contracts|Trust is Good. A Contract is Better

Blog Post 7

Empowering Excellence in Legal Services Since 2011.

Footer Main

<p>The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, /<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="http://www.zentrumlaw.com">www.zentrumlaw.com</a>, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Zentrum Law Partners of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement, or inducement by Zentrum Law Partners or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Zentrum Law Partners shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Zentrum Law Partners.</p>

Disclaimer

Disclaimer 1

Blogs Content

At Zentrum Law Partners, we're more than just legal experts. Founded in 2021 by distinguished alumni of the National Law Institute University, our journey is rooted in a commitment to delivering unparalleled legal excellence.